Essays and reflections on area management, intense localization, community livelihoods, and the everyday practice of building place-based economies.
Humanity has reached an unprecedented milestone: a global population exceeding eight billion people. This paper argues that this historic quantity represents a potential quantum threshold, a point at which a phase transition in collective consciousness is not only possible but necessary.
This paper examines the traditional sectoral, top-down, command-and-control management system. We argue that this model, narrowly focused on product or service profitability, fundamentally operates on the psychological signal of fear.
The Catholic Church possesses one of the world's most profound and consistent bodies of social teaching. Yet, despite its immense moral authority and global reach, the very injustices it decries continue to accelerate. The reason is a tragic paradox: the Church has been trying to run its sacred social software on a corrupt and incompatible operating system.
While no country has formally adopted "Areaism" as its state ideology, several nations have, through their unique historical and cultural development, institutionalized key principles of it. They demonstrate that organizing a society around wholeness, subsidiarity, and well-being is not a utopian fantasy but a proven path to stability and prosperity.
To look at our world today is to feel a sense of overwhelming inertia. We see the escalating crises and feel trapped within a system, Sectoralism, that is driving us toward an abyss. This feeling of hopelessness is a strategic illusion. Radical transformation doesn't occur through a gradual, linear process. It happens like an avalanche: slowly at first, and then all at once.
This paper examines José Rizal's writings and vision for Philippine society, arguing that his ideas about self-governance, education, and community development represent an early articulation of Areaist principles that remain profoundly relevant to contemporary Philippines.
Areaism is an ideology that sees the world not as a collection of competing parts, but as a series of nested, living wholes, starting with the person and scaling up, from households through the landscape. It is a return to a fundamental truth that Sectoralism has forced us to forget: healthy systems are integrated, not fragmented.
The riveting issue of massive-scale corruption in nations like the Philippines and Nepal is not an accident of culture or a simple failure of leadership. It is a predictable and guaranteed outcome of the ruling ideology, Sectoralism. Areaism, in stark contrast, is the ideology of the whole. Its very structure creates an immune system of transparency and accountability.
For decades, the discourse around our global crises has been framed as a battle of ideologies: Capitalism vs. Communism, Globalism vs. Nationalism. We now recognize these as mere factions of a single, flawed operating system—Sectoralism. The emerging alternative, Areaism, is NOT being presented as its revolutionary replacement.
Get notified when Mr. Philip Camara publishes new essays and reflections on area management and community development.
We respect your inbox. Privacy policy